y77777 games

LAHAINA, Hawaii (AP) — Tyrese Hunter scored 17 of his 26 points after halftime to lead Memphis to a 99-97 overtime win against two-time defending national champion and second-ranked UConn on Monday in the first round of the Maui Invitational . Hunter shot 7 of 10 from 3-point range for the Tigers (5-0), who were 12 of 22 from beyond at the arc as a team. PJ Haggerty had 22 points and five assists, Colby Rogers had 19 points and Dain Dainja scored 14. Tarris Reed Jr. had 22 points and 11 rebounds off the bench for the Huskies (4-1). Alex Karaban had 19 points and six assists, and Jaylin Stewart scored 16. Memphis led by as many as 13 with about four minutes left in regulation, but UConn chipped away and eventually tied it on Solo Ball’s 3-pointer with 1.2 seconds remaining. Memphis: The Tigers ranked second nationally in field goal percentage going into the game and shot it at a 54.7% clip. UConn: The Huskies saw their string of 17 consecutive wins dating back to February come to an end. The teams were tied at 92 with less than a minute remaining in overtime when UConn coach Dan Hurley was assessed a technical foul for his displeasure with an over-the-back call against Liam McNeeley. PJ Carter hit four straight free throws — two for the tech and the other pair for the personal foul — to give Memphis a 96-92 lead with 40.3 seconds to play. UConn had three players foul out. Memphis attempted 40 free throws and made 29 of them. Memphis will play the winner of Colorado-Michigan State on Tuesday in the second round of the invitational. UConn will play the loser of that game in the consolation bracket. Get poll alerts and updates on the AP Top 25 throughout the season. Sign up here . AP college basketball: https://apnews.com/hub/ap-top-25-college-basketball-poll and https://apnews.com/hub/college-basketball .
Pink's children Willow and Jameson have fans saying the same thing with festive new photosA petition calling for the “immediate suspension” of mRNA Covid vaccines has attracted a number of high-profile backers — including the man picked by US President-elect Donald Trump to lead the country’s main public health research agency. The Hope Accord, an online petition launched earlier this year, states that a “growing body of evidence suggests the widespread rollout of the novel Covid-19 mRNA vaccine products is contributing to an alarming rise in disability and excess deaths”. Such claims have repeatedly been rejected by public health authorities and leading medical experts. “This new technology was granted emergency use authorisation to address a situation that no longer exists,” the petition states. “Going forward, the burden of proof falls on those still advocating for these products to compellingly demonstrate that they aren’t resulting in net harm. Until such evidence is presented, regulators should suspend their use as a matter of standard medical precaution.” The petition was co-created by Dr Joseph Fraiman, a Louisiana-based ER physician and medical researcher. Dr Fraiman was the lead author of a study last year that reanalysed Pfizer and Moderna’s original randomised trials, concluding that the rate of serious harm from the vaccines was one in 800, far higher than previously suggested. Dr Jay Bhattacharya, a vocal critic of Covid lockdowns who has been picked by Mr Trump to run the National Institutes of Health (NIH), called Dr Fraiman’s study “probably the most important paper during the pandemic” about Covid vaccines. Stanford University infectious diseases specialist Dr Jay Bhattacharya. Picture: Supplied “It was a very rigorous paper and I think [it] had probably the biggest impact in my thinking about the safety of vaccines,” Dr Bhattacharya said in a July interview with Dr Fraiman for his podcast, The Illusion of Consensus . Writing on X at the time, Dr Bhattacharya said the debate had convinced him to sign the petition calling for the vaccines’ regulatory authorisation to be pulled. “I hesitated to sign because I was concerned that some patient groups may still benefit from it,” he said. “Joe, very reasonably, asked me how we could know who falls into those categories. The answer, of course, would come from randomised clinical trial evidence with solid clinical endpoints like prevention of long Covid, hospitalisation or death. “By the end of the debate, Joe had convinced me that not pulling the authorisation makes it more likely that we will never get good clinical trial evidence testing to check whether such groups still exist in a setting of widespread recovered immunity.” New on my Illusion of Consensus podcast, I debate with @JosephFraiman on his HOPE Accord, a public petition to restore ethics to public health and to pull regulatory authorization for the marketing of the covid mRNA vaccine. I hesitated to sign because I was concerned that some⦠— Jay Bhattacharya (@DrJBhattacharya) July 11, 2024 Dr Bhattacharya’s public support for the petition is noteworthy as he could soon be in charge of the NIH’s $US47 billion ($74 billion) annual budget, which funds research into vaccines, cancer and other diseases. His nomination would need to be approved by the Senate. The Hope Accord petition also calls for a “comprehensive re-evaluation” of the safety and efficacy of all Covid vaccines, including a “full exploration of mechanisms of harm to provide insight into their impact on the human body, both short and long term”. “Effectiveness must be reassessed through a comprehensive review of actual clinical impact on illness and mortality, as opposed to synthetic results based on modelled assumptions,” it states. A vaccination centre at University College London Hospital. Picture: Tolga Akmen/AFP ‘Conspiracy theories’ British cardiologist Aseem Malhotra, who co-created the petition, published an open letter on Tuesday in response to a long-running disciplinary probe by the UK’s General Medical Council (GMC) over complaints he was spreading “Covid vaccine misinformation” and “conspiracy theories”. “There is undeniable evidence that there are serious risks associated with Covid-19 vaccine for at least some individuals,” he wrote. “At this point in time, the evidence of the Covid mRNA product doing significantly more harm than good is overwhelming, even for the highest-risk groups.” Professor Angus Dalgleish, head of oncology at St George’s Hospital in London, and Australian immunologist Robert Clancy, Emeritus Professor at the University of Newcastle, have backed Dr Malhotra’s claims in letters of support provided to the UK medical practitioners register. “Two of the world’s pre-eminent experts in oncology and immunology respectively feel there is strong mechanistic and clinical evidence through different pathways, including prolonged immunosuppression and DNA contamination, [that] the Covid mRNA vaccines cause cancer,” Dr Malhotra said. Prof Dalgleish, a prominent Covid sceptic , stated that he had “witnessed an outbreak of melanoma relapses in patients that had been stable on my immunotherapy treatment programs for over five to 18 years”. British cardiologist Dr Aseem Malhotra. Picture: GB News “The only thing they had in common is that they had all had booster vaccines which as predicted were causing T cell suppression,” he wrote. “I continue to see these relapses as well as rapid cancer progression after these totally unnecessary boosters. The tragedy is that all oncology doctors are seeing this but are afraid to speak out with a few exceptions.” Prof Clancy, who was denounced by the University of Newcastle in 2021 as “not an expert” on Covid after controversial comments supporting the use of hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin, said in his letter that the mRNA vaccines had “attracted a forest of red flags including unprecedented mortality and morbidity, unknown genetic confusion, and disappointing clinical value”. “Why is it that all doctors are not screaming for review of mRNA vaccines?” he wrote. Dr Malhotra is also supported in his GMC complaint by former Australian tennis champion Pat Cash, now a BBC commentator, and Jay Naidoo, a prominent South African trade unionist and anti-apartheid leader. “My advocacy to suspend the Covid-19 mRNA vaccine is not an isolated voice,” he wrote. “The longer the General Medical Council, the Secretary of State for Health, and the Chief Medical Officer delay on acting on this, the greater the harm to public health, the further decrease in trust in the medical profession, and the more strain on an already failing NHS.” A health worker prepares a dose of the Covid vaccine. Picture: Justin Tallis/AFP ‘No credible evidence’ Claims that Covid vaccines have contributed to a rise in excess deaths have repeatedly been rejected by the Australian government, including the Department of Health and Aged Care and the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS), as well as independent bodies like the Actuaries Institute, which maintain there is “no credible evidence” supporting such a link. The Health Department, which encourages Australians to “rely on reputable sources of information”, says Covid vaccines “have been thoroughly assessed by the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) and found to be safe and effective”. “The TGA checks all Covid-19 vaccines for quality, safety and effectiveness before approving them for use in Australia,” it states on its website . “This is the same process that all vaccines go through in Australia. Medical experts at the TGA continuously check all vaccines to make sure they are safe. Vaccines are only approved for use in Australia after they have been assessed to show that the benefits of the vaccine outweigh any risks.” The Health Department notes that “millions of people around the world have now had Covid-19 vaccines, giving us real evidence and data that support using the vaccines” and “clinical trials and real-world data show that Covid-19 vaccines are highly effective at preventing severe illness”. Modelling by Monash University and RMIT earlier this year suggested the vaccine rollout saved nearly 18,000 lives in NSW between August 2021 and July 2022, during the end of the Delta wave and the arrival of Omicron. The World Health Organization (WHO) says that in 2021 alone, Covid vaccines “saved at least an estimated 14.4 million lives worldwide”. A recent paper in the journal Vaccines estimated the timely rollout of Covid jabs resulted in overall benefit to the Australian economy of $181 billion. frank.chung@news.com.au More Coverage UK professor rips Aussie Covid ‘madness’ Frank Chung Devastating warning for the next pandemic Jessica Wang Originally published as ‘Emergency no longer exists’: Doctors call for Covid vaccines to be pulled to reassess safety Read related topics: Donald Trump Illness Don't miss out on the headlines from Illness. Followed categories will be added to My News. Join the conversation Add your comment to this story To join the conversation, please log in. Don't have an account? Register Join the conversation, you are commenting as Logout More related stories Illness Shock find in pimple mum ‘squeezed too hard’ A young mother has issued a warning for Australians after discovering a “pimple” was in fact something much more sinister. Read more Illness ‘Awkward’: Doc reveals X-rated Xmas problem A doctor has revealed the Christmas gifts we should never buy if we want to avoid embarrassment or injury – including one naughty item. Read more
Influencer’s shock death at 28 caught on camTikTok is challenging the federal government’s order to shut down its operations in Canada. The company filed in documents in Federal Court in Vancouver on Thursday. The government ordered the dissolution of TikTok’s Canadian business in November after a national security review of the Chinese company behind the social media platform. That means TikTok must “wind down” its operations in Canada, though the app will continue to be available to Canadians. TikTok wants the court to overturn the government’s order and to place a pause on the order while the court hears the case. It is claiming the minister’s decision was “unreasonable” and “driven by improper purposes.” The review was carried out through the Investment Canada Act, which allows the government to investigate any foreign investment with potential to harm national security. Industry Minister François-Philippe Champagne said in a statement at the time the government was taking action to address “specific national security risks,” though it didn’t specify what those risks were. TikTok’s filing says Champagne “failed to engage with TikTok Canada on the purported substance of the concerns that led to the (order.)” The company argues the government ordered “measures that bear no rational connection to the national security risks it identifies.” It says the reasons for the order “are unintelligible, fail to reveal a rational chain of analysis and are rife with logical fallacies.” The company’s law firm, Osler Hoskin & Harcourt LLP, declined to comment, while Champagne’s office did not immediately respond to a request for comment. A TikTok spokesperson said in a statement that the order would “eliminate the jobs and livelihoods of our hundreds of dedicated local employees — who support the community of more than 14 million monthly Canadian users on TikTok, including businesses, advertisers, creators and initiatives developed especially for Canada.” This report by The Canadian Press was first published Dec. 10, 2024. Darryl Greer and Anja Karadeglija, The Canadian Press
A petition calling for the “immediate suspension” of mRNA Covid vaccines has attracted a number of high-profile backers — including the man picked by US President-elect Donald Trump to lead the country’s main public health research agency. The Hope Accord, an online petition launched earlier this year, states that a “growing body of evidence suggests the widespread rollout of the novel Covid-19 mRNA vaccine products is contributing to an alarming rise in disability and excess deaths”. Such claims have repeatedly been rejected by public health authorities and leading medical experts. “This new technology was granted emergency use authorisation to address a situation that no longer exists,” the petition states. “Going forward, the burden of proof falls on those still advocating for these products to compellingly demonstrate that they aren’t resulting in net harm. Until such evidence is presented, regulators should suspend their use as a matter of standard medical precaution.” The petition was co-created by Dr Joseph Fraiman, a Louisiana-based ER physician and medical researcher. Dr Fraiman was the lead author of a study last year that reanalysed Pfizer and Moderna’s original randomised trials, concluding that the rate of serious harm from the vaccines was one in 800, far higher than previously suggested. Dr Jay Bhattacharya, a vocal critic of Covid lockdowns who has been picked by Mr Trump to run the National Institutes of Health (NIH), called Dr Fraiman’s study “probably the most important paper during the pandemic” about Covid vaccines. Stanford University infectious diseases specialist Dr Jay Bhattacharya. Picture: Supplied “It was a very rigorous paper and I think [it] had probably the biggest impact in my thinking about the safety of vaccines,” Dr Bhattacharya said in a July interview with Dr Fraiman for his podcast, The Illusion of Consensus . Writing on X at the time, Dr Bhattacharya said the debate had convinced him to sign the petition calling for the vaccines’ regulatory authorisation to be pulled. “I hesitated to sign because I was concerned that some patient groups may still benefit from it,” he said. “Joe, very reasonably, asked me how we could know who falls into those categories. The answer, of course, would come from randomised clinical trial evidence with solid clinical endpoints like prevention of long Covid, hospitalisation or death. “By the end of the debate, Joe had convinced me that not pulling the authorisation makes it more likely that we will never get good clinical trial evidence testing to check whether such groups still exist in a setting of widespread recovered immunity.” New on my Illusion of Consensus podcast, I debate with @JosephFraiman on his HOPE Accord, a public petition to restore ethics to public health and to pull regulatory authorization for the marketing of the covid mRNA vaccine. I hesitated to sign because I was concerned that some⦠— Jay Bhattacharya (@DrJBhattacharya) July 11, 2024 Dr Bhattacharya’s public support for the petition is noteworthy as he could soon be in charge of the NIH’s $US47 billion ($74 billion) annual budget, which funds research into vaccines, cancer and other diseases. His nomination would need to be approved by the Senate. The Hope Accord petition also calls for a “comprehensive re-evaluation” of the safety and efficacy of all Covid vaccines, including a “full exploration of mechanisms of harm to provide insight into their impact on the human body, both short and long term”. “Effectiveness must be reassessed through a comprehensive review of actual clinical impact on illness and mortality, as opposed to synthetic results based on modelled assumptions,” it states. A vaccination centre at University College London Hospital. Picture: Tolga Akmen/AFP ‘Conspiracy theories’ British cardiologist Aseem Malhotra, who co-created the petition, published an open letter on Tuesday in response to a long-running disciplinary probe by the UK’s General Medical Council (GMC) over complaints he was spreading “Covid vaccine misinformation” and “conspiracy theories”. “There is undeniable evidence that there are serious risks associated with Covid-19 vaccine for at least some individuals,” he wrote. “At this point in time, the evidence of the Covid mRNA product doing significantly more harm than good is overwhelming, even for the highest-risk groups.” Professor Angus Dalgleish, head of oncology at St George’s Hospital in London, and Australian immunologist Robert Clancy, Emeritus Professor at the University of Newcastle, have backed Dr Malhotra’s claims in letters of support provided to the UK medical practitioners register. “Two of the world’s pre-eminent experts in oncology and immunology respectively feel there is strong mechanistic and clinical evidence through different pathways, including prolonged immunosuppression and DNA contamination, [that] the Covid mRNA vaccines cause cancer,” Dr Malhotra said. Prof Dalgleish, a prominent Covid sceptic , stated that he had “witnessed an outbreak of melanoma relapses in patients that had been stable on my immunotherapy treatment programs for over five to 18 years”. British cardiologist Dr Aseem Malhotra. Picture: GB News “The only thing they had in common is that they had all had booster vaccines which as predicted were causing T cell suppression,” he wrote. “I continue to see these relapses as well as rapid cancer progression after these totally unnecessary boosters. The tragedy is that all oncology doctors are seeing this but are afraid to speak out with a few exceptions.” Prof Clancy, who was denounced by the University of Newcastle in 2021 as “not an expert” on Covid after controversial comments supporting the use of hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin, said in his letter that the mRNA vaccines had “attracted a forest of red flags including unprecedented mortality and morbidity, unknown genetic confusion, and disappointing clinical value”. “Why is it that all doctors are not screaming for review of mRNA vaccines?” he wrote. Dr Malhotra is also supported in his GMC complaint by former Australian tennis champion Pat Cash, now a BBC commentator, and Jay Naidoo, a prominent South African trade unionist and anti-apartheid leader. “My advocacy to suspend the Covid-19 mRNA vaccine is not an isolated voice,” he wrote. “The longer the General Medical Council, the Secretary of State for Health, and the Chief Medical Officer delay on acting on this, the greater the harm to public health, the further decrease in trust in the medical profession, and the more strain on an already failing NHS.” A health worker prepares a dose of the Covid vaccine. Picture: Justin Tallis/AFP ‘No credible evidence’ Claims that Covid vaccines have contributed to a rise in excess deaths have repeatedly been rejected by the Australian government, including the Department of Health and Aged Care and the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS), as well as independent bodies like the Actuaries Institute, which maintain there is “no credible evidence” supporting such a link. The Health Department, which encourages Australians to “rely on reputable sources of information”, says Covid vaccines “have been thoroughly assessed by the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) and found to be safe and effective”. “The TGA checks all Covid-19 vaccines for quality, safety and effectiveness before approving them for use in Australia,” it states on its website . “This is the same process that all vaccines go through in Australia. Medical experts at the TGA continuously check all vaccines to make sure they are safe. Vaccines are only approved for use in Australia after they have been assessed to show that the benefits of the vaccine outweigh any risks.” The Health Department notes that “millions of people around the world have now had Covid-19 vaccines, giving us real evidence and data that support using the vaccines” and “clinical trials and real-world data show that Covid-19 vaccines are highly effective at preventing severe illness”. Modelling by Monash University and RMIT earlier this year suggested the vaccine rollout saved nearly 18,000 lives in NSW between August 2021 and July 2022, during the end of the Delta wave and the arrival of Omicron. The World Health Organization (WHO) says that in 2021 alone, Covid vaccines “saved at least an estimated 14.4 million lives worldwide”. A recent paper in the journal Vaccines estimated the timely rollout of Covid jabs resulted in overall benefit to the Australian economy of $181 billion. frank.chung@news.com.au More Coverage UK professor rips Aussie Covid ‘madness’ Frank Chung Devastating warning for the next pandemic Jessica Wang Originally published as ‘Emergency no longer exists’: Doctors call for Covid vaccines to be pulled to reassess safety Read related topics: Donald Trump Illness Don't miss out on the headlines from Illness. Followed categories will be added to My News. Join the conversation Add your comment to this story To join the conversation, please log in. Don't have an account? Register Join the conversation, you are commenting as Logout More related stories Illness Shock find in pimple mum ‘squeezed too hard’ A young mother has issued a warning for Australians after discovering a “pimple” was in fact something much more sinister. Read more Illness ‘Awkward’: Doc reveals X-rated Xmas problem A doctor has revealed the Christmas gifts we should never buy if we want to avoid embarrassment or injury – including one naughty item. Read moreTrump not back in office but already pushing his agenda and negotiating with world leadersPlayStation has dropped its 2024 Wrap-Up tool, allowing users to get full insight into their gaming habits this year. Until January 10th, 2025, the Spotify Wrapped -esque feature will show PS4 and PS5 their most played games, monthly gaming stats, gaming styles and more. This year, PlayStation has also introduced personalized historical statistics, which look beyond 2024 to show how many games you’ve played and trophies you’ve earned since creating your PSN account, as well as personalized PS Plus game recommendations. You can access your 2024 PlayStation Wrap-Up here . (At the time of writing, the page doesn’t seem to be working for many people, as it gets stuck on a loading screen before crashing. We’ll update this story once that issue is fixed.) PlayStation says Wrap-Up will “continue to update” leading up to January 10th, so you’re encouraged to revisit it closer to that date for more data. Completing your Wrap-Up will net you a personalized Wrap-Up summary card that can be shared on social media, as well as a special PlayStation 30th anniversary avatar and PlayStation Stars digital collectible Xbox gamers can learn more about their own 2024 recap, ‘Year in Review,’ here . Image credit: PlayStation Source: PlayStation
NEW YORK — Imagine you’re a closer getting ready to face the opponent’s No. 9 hitter with two outs in the ninth inning of a one-run game, and all of a sudden, Juan Soto steps up to the plate. Or Aaron Judge. Or Shohei Ohtani. Or Francisco Lindor. Or some other elite hitter who shouldn’t be taking an at-bat in the nine-hole. Javascript is required for you to be able to read premium content. Please enable it in your browser settings.
- Previous: p777 online casino
- Next: haha 777 games