ocean magic free slots
ocean magic free slots
The 40 best beauty stocking stuffers that feel like little luxuries
NoneStephen McKinley Henderson is 'A Man on the Inside's' secret weaponWalmart’s DEI rollback signals a profound shift in the wake of Trump’s election victory
The latest development came hours after thousands of his supporters, defying government warnings, broke through a barrier of shipping containers blocking off Islamabad and entered a high-security zone, where they clashed with security forces, facing tear gas shelling, mass detentions and gunfire. Tension has been high in Islamabad since Sunday when supporters of the former PM began a “long march” from the restive north-west to demand his release. Khan has been in a prison for more than a year and faces more than 150 criminal cases that his party says are politically motivated. Khan’s wife, Bushra Bibi, led the protest, but she fled as police pushed back against demonstrators. Hundreds of Khan’s supporters are being arrested in the ongoing night-time operation. Interior minister Mohsin Naqvi told reporters that the Red Zone, which houses government buildings and embassies, and the surrounding areas have been cleared. Leaders from Khan’s Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf party, or PTI, have also fled the protest site. Earlier on Tuesday, Pakistan’s army took control of D-Chowk, a large square in the Red Zone, where visiting Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko is staying. Since Monday, Mr Naqvi had threatened that security forces would use live fire if protesters fired weapons at them. “We have now authorised the police to respond as necessary,” Mr Naqvi said Tuesday while visiting the square. Before the operation began, protester Shahzor Ali said people had taken to the streets because Khan had called for them. “We will stay here until Khan joins us. He will decide what to do next,” Mr Ali said. Protester Fareeda Bibi, who is not related to Khan’s wife, said people have suffered greatly for the last two years. “We have really suffered for the last two years, whether it is economically, politically or socially. We have been ruined. I have not seen such a Pakistan in my life,” she said. Authorities have struggled to contain the protest-related violence. Six people, including four members of the security services, were killed when a vehicle rammed them on a street overnight into Tuesday. A police officer died in a separate incident. Dozens of Khan supporters beat a videographer covering the protest for the Associated Press and took his camera. He sustained head injuries and was treated in hospital. By Tuesday afternoon, fresh waves of protesters made their way unopposed to their final destination in the Red Zone. Mr Naqvi said Khan’s party had rejected a government offer to rally on the outskirts of the city. Information minister Atta Tarar warned there would be a severe government reaction to the violence. The government says only the courts can order Khan’s release. He was ousted in 2022 through a no-confidence vote in Parliament. In a bid to foil the unrest, police have arrested more than 4,000 Khan supporters since Friday and suspended mobile and internet services in some parts of the country. Messaging platforms were also experiencing severe disruption in the capital. Khan’s party relies heavily on social media and uses messaging platforms such as WhatsApp to share information, including details of events. The X platform, which is banned in Pakistan, is no longer accessible, even with a VPN. Last Thursday, a court prohibited rallies in the capital and Mr Naqvi said anyone violating the ban would be arrested. Travel between Islamabad and other cities has become nearly impossible because of shipping containers blocking the roads. All education institutions remain closed.
H aughty defiance has become Emmanuel Macron’s go-to tone during a second term marred by chaos, acrimony and recrimination. During his prime-time television address to the French nation last week, following the toppling of the centre-right prime minister he appointed only three months ago, Mr Macron loftily declined to take responsibility for France’s worst political crisis in decades. “Some people are tempted to blame me for this situation,” the president acidly observed after accepting Michel Barnier’s resignation. “It’s much more comfortable.” In fact, he suggested, responsibility lay entirely with the political forces who, in delivering the first no-confidence judgment on a government since 1961, had committed an “anti-republican” act of sabotage. The leftwing daily Libération offered a pithy and apt two-word headline riposte to such presidential hauteur: “ Flagrant déni” (“In flagrant denial”). Beyond the blame game, though, what now? As the disastrous consequences of Mr Macron’s decision to hold snap legislative elections in the summer continue to unfold, France finds itself without a functioning government for the second time in six months. Having squandered his relative majority, and handed unprecedented kingmaker status in the Assemblée to Marine Le Pen’s far-right MPs, the president is searching for a fourth prime minister in the space of a year. There is no reason to suppose the next one will find it easier than Mr Barnier to negotiate a parliament divided into three warring blocs. But there can be no fresh elections until July. The markets are spooked , and there is no budget in place for 2025. Mr Barnier’s fate was sealed by Ms Le Pen’s refusal to endorse an austerity budget that targeted pensioners – a constituency crucial to her chances of success in the next presidential election. Having pledged to name a new prime minister within days, Mr Macron could opt for another centrist or centre‐right figure, in the hope of better placating her. This arrangement, almost certainly, would also end in tears at a time of Ms Le Pen’s choosing. A more durable, and ethical, solution would be for Mr Macron to finally demonstrate the humility he should have shown after the chastening outcome of his summer gamble. The July snap poll was narrowly, but indubitably, won by the New Popular Front (NPF) – a leftwing alliance including the Socialist party and Jean-Luc Mélenchon’s France Unbowed. Fearing that an NPF-led government would attempt to reverse parts of his legacy, including deeply unpopular plans to raise the retirement age, Mr Macron found reasons not to appoint a prime minister from the broad left. That decision was undemocratic, self-indulgent and turned the largest parliamentary bloc of MPs implacably against him. It was also deeply anti‐republican. Mr Macron’s political career has been built on the back of “republican” votes loaned to him to ward off the threat of a Le Pen presidency. In July, the first far-right government in postwar history was only averted by a similar mobilisation and the hasty formation of the NPF alliance. If he is to avoid a lame duck presidency degenerating to the point where his own humiliating resignation becomes unavoidable, the president needs to recognise that election losers don’t get to dictate terms. Instead of cynically looking to Ms Le Pen to prop up the next government, Mr Macron should move from talking the talk when it comes to republican values, to walking the walk.
Gophers star Mara Braun to have foot surgery; uncertain if she’ll return this season
Cooperation or Competition? On Nov. 7, Chinese President Xi Jinping sent a congratulatory message to President-elect Trump that said: “A stable, healthy, sustainably developing China-US relationship fits with the common interests of the two countries and with the expectations of international society. I hope the two sides will keep to the principles of mutual respect, peaceful coexistence, and win-win cooperation, strengthen channels of dialogue, improve control over differences, expand mutually beneficial cooperation, and move down the road of correctly getting along in a new period, with prosperity for both countries and benefits to the world.” Subsequently, other Chinese sources, as well as Xi in his final meeting with President Biden at the APEC summit on Nov. 16, repeated this line of thought: China wants more rather than less cooperation with the US. An article in the People’s Daily the day after Xi’s message by Zhong Sheng (The Bell), an authoritative editorial collective, reinforced it, saying: “Win-win cooperation is the trend of the times and should be the bottom line of China-US relations.” The writers reminded readers of China-US economic interdependence: “Today, China is the third-largest export market for U.S. goods, and the US is China’s third-largest trading partner. Over 70,000 US companies invest and operate in China, and exports to China alone support 930,000 US jobs. Last year, 1,920 new US companies were established in China, and 80 percent of US companies in China plan to reinvest their profits this year.” The commentary cited achievements of China-US cooperation in diplomacy, finance, climate change, and military-to-military communication. Thus, wrote Zhong Sheng, “whether promoting world economic recovery or resolving international and regional hotspot issues, China-US coordination and cooperation are needed.” Coordination and cooperation are very unlikely to be realized, however, because of probably insuperable obstacles each country has set. The second Trump administration will not merely reject engagement, as Biden’s did; this time around, relations with China will be on a much steeper slope. Under Trump, we will no longer hear about “managing” relations or looking for shared interests. US officials are unlikely to repeat promises to China to uphold the One-China policy and not seek to change China’s system. Stabilizing the US-China relationship, which drew praise from Xi at his final meeting with Biden — "The [China-US] relationship has remained stable on the whole,” Xi said — will no longer be important to Washington. There are several already clear reasons for this conclusion: Trump’s announced determination to impose very high tariffs on Chinese goods, his appointment of China hawks to key national security positions, the bipartisan hostility toward China in Congress, China’s high unfavorable rating in American public opinion, and the advice Trump has received from previous appointees in the Project 2025 report. Moreover, as I discuss below, Trump, unlike Biden, will not be distracted from his China policy by overseas conflicts. As for China, the emphasis on points of actual and potential collaboration with the US is just one piece of its America policy. Xi qualifies cooperation in important ways — by saying that the US must have a “correct strategic perception” of China, must adhere to the three principles mentioned in Xi’s message to Trump, and must choose between “partnership or rivalry.” Those qualifications aim at specific elements of US policy: security alliances directed at the “China threat,” military and political support of Taiwan, and denial of semiconductor and other high-tech exports to China. US presidents, Donald Trump least of all, have not been moved by appeals to principle. Nor have they been open to “correcting” their perceptions of China to suit Beijing. Nevertheless, it is worth examining where room for a China-US deal might exist. A major caveat is in order, however: We have to recognize that Donald Trump’s modus operandi centers, as Bob Woodward has said in his various books on Trump, on fear and winning. In Trump’s transactional framework, the “art of the deal” is to instill fear in the opponent, never fold, and focus on winning. And winning means getting a “good return on investment,” not compromising for short-term gain and most certainly not hoping to promote trust. In his first administration, Trump had to deal with advisers who were not all in on Trump’s style — policy managers who valued diplomacy as an alternative to confrontation. Now, with few guardrails to restrain Trump, he will dominate the policy making scene as never before. His appointments of loyalists, some of whom are viscerally hostile to China and others of whom are vastly inexperienced, virtually ensure that Trump’s word will be unquestioningly followed. We have three early signs of the China hawks’ intentions. In the House of Representatives, the Republicans’ “China Week” agenda — an agenda put forward in October 2024 that basically calls for decoupling from China in multiple ways, including in trade, investment, educational exchanges, and scientific collaboration — is being readied for approval with some Democrats’ support. And the bipartisan U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission’s annual report to Congress recommends even more provocative steps, such as revoking China’s bilateral free trade privileges; barring the import of technologies from China; and creating a Manhattan Project to achieve artificial intelligence capable of surpassing human cognition. A third sign comes from Project 2025, which Trump has disavowed even though many of its authors once worked for him. Among them are Kiron K. Skinner, who labels China "the defining threat"; Christopher Miller, who writes that China is “a challenge to American interests across the domains of national power" and an imminent threat to Taiwan; and Peter Navarro, author of books on the China threat. Navarro’s Project 2025 chapter includes this warning: “The clear lesson learned in both the Obama and Trump Administrations is that Communist China will never bargain in good faith with the U.S. to stop its aggression. An equally clear lesson learned by President Trump, which he was ready to implement in a second term, was that the better policy option was to decouple both economically and financially from Communist China as further negotiations would indeed be both fruitless and dangerous ... ” What might a good return on investment look like to Trump? Since his top priority is trade, he would aim at a major increase in Chinese purchases of US goods to reduce the trade deficit (even though that didn’t work the first time around) and improved conditions for US investments, all while retaining sharp restrictions on advanced technology exports to China. In return, Trump might be willing to lower US tariffs on Chinese imports. He also might induce Xi by promising to reduce US arms aid and high-level visits to Taiwan, though he might get pushback from strongly pro-Taiwan officials such as Marco Rubio (nominated for secretary of state) and Mike Waltz (nominated for national security adviser). Trump would be far less interested in making a deal on China’s military aid to Russia, climate change, scientific and other exchanges, or human rights. Some of those issues are important to some Republicans, but they rank low (if at all) among Trump’s priorities. Nor would strategic issues that have bipartisan and Pentagon concern necessarily get Trump’s attention: the South China Sea disputes (including protection of Philippines ships), US security coalitions in Asia (the Quad and AUKUS), and competition with China in the Pacific island microstates. In Trump’s mind, these involvements soak up US resources and risk unacceptable levels of commitment. But they could be bargaining chips. Trump might be willing to backtrack on US security commitments in Asia, bilateral and multilateral, if a winning commercial deal proved attainable. If the "art of a deal" proves illusory, Trump may seek to weaponize tariffs. But China might, as happened in Trump’s first term, prefer a trade war to giving in to Trump's demands. In my previous writings , I offered several reasons why the threat of very high US tariffs will not work with the Chinese. They're ready this time, and have already taken measures to deal with the tariff threat, such as by shifting export markets to the Global South and Europe. We’re at a point in US-China relations where deal making is going to be very difficult even in the best of circumstances. Mutual trust is very low, and once Trump takes over, initiatives to “get along,” as the Chinese say, will not be offered. Consequently, it will not take much to derail diplomacy altogether, as happened after the spy balloon incident in February 2023 or, in November 2024, China’s rejection of a meeting between defense ministers because (China said) of a US arms sale to Taiwan. Chinese proposals for deeper cooperation will be used to demonstrate that they are the reasonable party and that the Americans are as unpredictable as they are untrustworthy. And China will use that argument to try driving a wedge between the US and its allies in the European Union and East Asia. Feel the chill of the coming Cold War. — Mel Gurtov, syndicated by PeaceVoice , is Professor Emeritus of Political Science at Portland State University and blogs at In the Human Interest .Manchester City's struggles continued as Pep Guardiola's side remarkably blew a three-goal lead to draw 3-3 with Feyenoord in the Champions League on Tuesday, while Bayern Munich beat Paris Saint-Germain to leave the French club in danger of elimination. There were also big wins for Arsenal, Atletico Madrid, Atalanta and Bayer Leverkusen, while Inter Milan went top of the standings after five games and Barcelona's Robert Lewandowski reached a century of Champions League goals.NEW YORK (AP) — The virtual president-elect of the United States, Donald Trump , threatened on Monday to impose new tariffs on Mexico, Canada, and China as soon as he takes office, as part of his plans to combat illegal immigration and drug trafficking. He said he would impose a 25% tax on all products entering the country from Canada and Mexico , and an additional 10% tariff on goods from China, as one of his first decrees. PUBLICIDAD If implemented, tariffs could drastically increase prices of everything in the United States, from gasoline and cars to agricultural products. The United States is the world's largest importer of goods, with Mexico, China, and Canada being its top three suppliers, according to the most recent data from the US Census. PUBLICIDAD Trump made the threats in a series of posts on his Truth Social social media platform, where he complained about the arrival of unauthorized migrants, even though border crossings at the southern border have remained close to their lowest level in the past four years. "On January 20th, as one of my many first decrees, I will sign all the necessary documents to charge Mexico and Canada a 25% tariff on all products entering the United States, and their ridiculous open borders," he wrote, complaining that "thousands of people are crossing through Mexico and Canada, bringing crime and drugs to levels never seen before," even though violent crime has decreased since the peaks recorded during the pandemic." He said that the new tariffs would remain in effect "until we stop this invasion of drugs, particularly fentanyl, and all illegal foreigners entering our country." "Both Mexico and Canada have the absolute right and power to easily resolve this problem that has been simmering for a long time. Through this means, we demand that they use this power," he added, "and until they do, it is time for them to pay a very high price." Trump also lashed out against China, stating that he has "had many conversations with China about the huge amounts of drugs, particularly fentanyl, being sent to the United States, but with no results." "Until they stop, we will be charging China an additional tariff of 10%, on top of any additional tariffs, on all of their many products entering the United States of America," he wrote. The Chinese embassy in Washington warned on Monday that there will be losers everywhere if there is a trade war. "The economic and trade cooperation between China and the United States is mutually beneficial by nature," stated embassy spokesperson Liu Pengyu on the social network X. "No one will win a trade war or a tariff war." He added that China has taken measures in the past year to help stop drug trafficking. It is not clear whether Trump will actually carry out the threats or if he is using them as a negotiating tactic before taking office in the new year. Trump's nominee for Treasury Secretary, Scott Bessent —who, if confirmed, would be one of several officials responsible for imposing tariffs on other countries—has stated on several occasions that tariffs are a negotiating tool. He wrote in an opinion article on Fox News last week, before his nomination, that tariffs are "a useful tool for achieving the president's foreign policy objectives. Whether to get allies to spend more on their own defense, open foreign markets to U.S. exports, ensure cooperation in ending illegal immigration and intercepting fentanyl trafficking, or deter military aggression, tariffs can play a central role." Trump won the election largely due to voters' frustration with inflation, but the tariffs he threatens to impose could further increase prices of food, cars, and other goods. If inflationary pressures rise, the Federal Reserve may need to keep its benchmark interest rates high. Trump's threats are known as arrests for illegally crossing the southern border have been decreasing. The figures for October show that detentions remain near their lowest level in four years. The Border Patrol reported 56,530 arrests in October, less than a third of last year's October total. Meanwhile, arrests for illegally crossing the border from Canada have been increasing over the past two years. The Border Patrol made 23,721 arrests between October 2023 and September 2024, compared to 10,021 in the previous 12 months. More than 14,000 of those arrested at the Canadian border were Indians, over 10 times the number from two years ago. Last week, a jury found two men guilty on charges related to human trafficking for their role in an international operation that led to the death of an Indian migrant family who froze while attempting to cross the border between Canada and the United States during a snowstorm in 2022. Much of the fentanyl in the United States is smuggled from Mexico. Border seizures of the drug significantly increased during Joe Biden's presidency, with US officials tallying approximately 12,247 kilograms (21,900 pounds) of seized fentanyl in the fiscal year 2024, compared to 1,154 kilograms (2,545 pounds) in 2019 when Trump was president. If Trump were to go ahead with the threat of tariffs, the new taxes would pose a huge challenge for the economies of Canada and Mexico, in particular. The Canadian dollar weakened in the foreign exchange markets immediately after Trump's publication. During Trump's first term, his decision to renegotiate the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) and reports that he was considering a 25% tariff on the Canadian automotive sector were seen as an existential threat in Canada. Canada is one of the most trade-dependent countries in the world, and 75% of Canada's exports, including automobiles, go to the United States. Tariffs would also cast doubt on the reliability of the 2020 trade agreement negotiated largely by Trump, the USMCA, which replaced NAFTA and is scheduled for review in 2026. It is not clear how Trump would legally apply tariff increases to these two key trading partners of the United States, but the 2020 agreement allows for national security exceptions. Officials from the Trump transition team did not respond to questions at the moment about what authority would be used, what they would need to see to prevent the tariffs from being implemented, and how they would affect prices in the United States. When Trump imposed higher tariffs during his first term, other countries responded with their own tariffs. Canada, for example, announced billions of dollars in new tariffs in 2018 in response to U.S. tariffs on Canadian steel and aluminum. Many of the American products were chosen for their political impact rather than economic. For example, Canada only imports $3 million worth of yogurt from the United States annually, and most of it comes from a plant in Wisconsin, the home state of the then Speaker of the House, Paul Ryan, a Republican. That product was taxed with a 10% tariff. The Canadian government, in a joint statement by Deputy Prime Minister Chrystia Freeland and Minister of Public Safety Dominic Leblanc, emphasized the close relationship between both countries and stated that they will discuss the border and extensive economic ties with the incoming administration. "Canada gives top priority to border security and the integrity of our shared border. Our relationship today is balanced and mutually beneficial, especially for American workers," reads the statement. Freeland, who chairs a special cabinet committee on Canada-US relations to address concerns about another Trump presidency, has said that the president-elect's promise to launch a massive deportation operation and the possibility that this could lead to an influx of migrants to Canada is one of the main points to be analyzed by the committee. A senior Canadian official had said before Trump's publications that Canadian officials expect Trump to issue decrees on trade and the border as soon as he takes office. The official was not authorized to speak publicly and spoke on condition of anonymity. The Mexican Secretariats of Foreign Affairs and Economy have not yet commented on Trump's statements. Normally, such important matters are addressed by the president during her morning press conferences. Last week, a senior Chinese trade official said that higher tariffs on Chinese exports would be counterproductive by raising prices for American consumers. The Vice Minister of Commerce, Wang Shouwen, also stated that China can handle the impact of such “external shocks.”
Riley scores 18, Utah Tech beats Denver 68-54
After almost 14 months of clashes, Israel and Hezbollah agree to a ceasefire proposed by the United States.
NEW YORK — One of the country’s largest health insurers reversed a change in policy Thursday after widespread outcry, saying it would not tie payments in some states to the length of time a patient went under anesthesia. Anthem Blue Cross Blue Shield said in a statement that its decision to backpedal resulted from “significant widespread misinformation” about the policy. “To be clear, it never was and never will be the policy of Anthem Blue Cross Blue Shield to not pay for medically necessary anesthesia services,” the statement said. “The proposed update to the policy was only designed to clarify the appropriateness of anesthesia consistent with well-established clinical guidelines.” Anthem Blue Cross Blue Shield would have used "physician work time values," which is published by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, as the metric for anesthesia limits; maternity patients and patients under the age of 22 were exempt. But Dr. Jonathan Gal, economics committee chair of the American Society for Anesthesiologists, said it's unclear how CMS derives those values. In mid-November, the American Society for Anesthesiologists called on Anthem to “reverse the proposal immediately,” saying in a news release that the policy would have taken effect in February in New York, Connecticut and Missouri. It's not clear how many states in total would have been affected, as notices also were posted in Virginia and Colorado . People across the country registered their concerns and complaints on social media, and encouraged people in affected states to call their legislators. Some people noted that the policy could prevent patients from getting overcharged. Gal said the policy change would have been unprecedented, ignored the “nuanced, unpredictable human element” of surgery and was a clear “money grab.” “It’s incomprehensible how a health insurance company could so blatantly continue to prioritize their profits over safe patient care,” he said. "If Anthem is, in fact, rescinding the policy, we’re delighted that they came to their senses.” Prior to Anthem's announcement Thursday, Connecticut comptroller Sean Scanlon said the “concerning” policy wouldn't affect the state after conversations with the insurance company. And New York Gov. Kathy Hochul said in an emailed statement Thursday that her office had also successfully intervened. The insurance giant’s policy change came one day after the CEO of UnitedHealthcare , another major insurance company, was shot and killed in New York City. ___ The Associated Press Health and Science Department receives support from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. The AP is solely responsible for all content.President-elect Donald Trump has nominated Pam Bondi to lead the Justice Department after Matt Gaetz withdrew from consideration amid allegations of sexual misconduct. "This is a good choice, in my opinion," said Republican Senator Mike Rounds of South Dakota. Bondi, Florida's first female attorney general, has more than 18 years of experience as a prosecutor. She challenged the Affordable Care Act and pushed for Florida's "Show Me Your Papers" immigration law. "Her priorities are right in line with Donald Trump's, not only his policies, but even going after some of the people that he wants gone after as retribution," said political analyst Marc Sandalow. Bondi endorsed Trump for president in 2016 and was on his legal team during his first impeachment trial. "Now, her loyalty to Trump is going to draw complaints that maybe she is going to serve as Trump's attorney at the Justice Department," Sandalow added. Under Trump's administration, the Justice Department is expected to change course on corporate enforcement, civil rights, and the prosecution of Jan. 6 defendants, whom Trump has pledged to pardon. Analysts say Bondi should not have trouble getting confirmed, unlike Gaetz, who faced significant opposition . "Simple math, I think was made clear that there's not a path," said Republican Sen. Kevin Cramer, of North Dakota. Bondi may face tough questions from lawmakers over declining to sue Trump University over fraud allegations after receiving a $25,000 campaign contribution from Trump in 2013. A prosecutor declined to press charges, and both Trump and Bondi deny wrongdoing. Gaetz called Bondi a "stellar selection" and said that even though he's not returning to Congress , he'll still be in the fight.
REFORM, Ala. (AP) — A federal judge ruled that the family of former NFL player Glenn Foster Jr., who died in law enforcement custody in Alabama, can pursue a lawsuit alleging his death was the result of excessive force. Foster, a former New Orleans Saints defensive end, died on Dec. 6, 2021, three days after being arrested and taken to jail in rural Pickens County for alleged speeding and attempting to elude police. A judge ordered Foster taken to a medical facility in Tuscaloosa for a mental evaluation. Foster was found unresponsive in the back of a law enforcement vehicle when he arrived at the facility. He was pronounced dead about 30 minutes later. His widow, Pamela Foster, filed a lawsuit against officers at the Pickens County Sheriff’s Office and jail saying Foster had been beaten, shocked with a Taser and strangled while at the jail. The defendants then asked a federal judge to dismiss the case. U.S. District Judge Annemarie Carney Axon ruled Thursday refused to dismiss allegations of excessive force and failure to intervene. Axon dismissed other portions of the lawsuit. The ruling came a day before the third anniversary of Foster’s death. Foster appeared in 17 games for the Saints in 2013 and 2014.INDIANAPOLIS (AP) — Jarvis Walker's 20 points helped IU Indianapolis defeat Trinity Christian 106-49 on Saturday. Walker shot 7 for 12, including 6 for 10 from beyond the arc for the Jaguars (4-5). Paul Zilinskas shot 5 for 9, including 4 for 7 from beyond the arc to add 15 points. DeSean Goode had 14 points and shot 4 of 5 from the field and 5 for 5 from the line. The Trolls were led in scoring by Tylan Harris, who finished with 11 points. Kaden Eirhart added nine points for Trinity Christian. The Associated Press created this story using technology provided by Data Skrive and data from Sportradar .
Trump calls meeting with Trudeau 'productive' after tariff threat
Australia facing grim situation in Adelaide Test but Justin Langer tips ‘fightback’None
- Previous:
- Next: ocean magic grand advantage play
